MULTIDISCIRLINARY APPROACH TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND DYSTROPHIC SPINE INJURY

Authors

  • Roman Herych Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • Ihor Vypasnyak Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • Bohdan Lisovskyi Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/fcult.34.161-165

Keywords:

multiple sclerosis, quality of life, myofascial pain syndrome, physical therapy

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to study and scientifically substantiate the impact of a multidisciplinary system of early physical therapy on the quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis complicated by dystrophic lesions of the lumbosacral spine. Methods. We examined 47 people (main group) with multiple sclerosis complicated by myofascial pain syndrome at the lumbosacral level, who underwent a course of early FT in the inpatient stage. This group included 25 women and 22 men. The average age of patients was 43.2±5.4 years. Clinical research methods (assessment of neurological status and limitation of vital activity according to functional classes), McGill pain questionnaire, VAS visual analog scale, quality of life assessment (MOS SF-36 questionnaire – Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-) were used for expert-rehabilitation diagnostics. 36). At the beginning and at the end of the FT course, QOL was assessed using the MOS SF-36 questionnaire, which contains 36 questions combined into 8 scales. From physiotherapeutic methods of influence magneto-laser therapy, darsonvalization, sinusoidal modulated currents, electrophoresis of analgesics, resorbing drugs, neurotrophic means, electro-stimulation of the weakened muscles, heat treatment, at a final stage FT – massage and local cryotherapy were applied. Active physical therapy was performed on the background of supportive drug therapy: vascular-regu-lating drugs, muscle relaxants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, neurotransmitters, chondroprotectors. Results. After the course of physical therapy, quality of life indicators increased on all scales. This is primarily due to the improvement of physical (46.3 points) and general (58.2 points) condition, which contributed to the stabilization of the emotional background (58.9 points) and became the basis for the normalization of role and social functioning (36.8 and 61.3 points respectively). Conclusion. A multidisciplinary approach to physical therapy of patients with multiple sclerosis complicated by myofascial pain and dystrophic lesions of the lumbosacral spine, helps to normalize their physical, emotional and general condition, which improves social activity and role functioning in patients.
Keywords: multiple sclerosis, quality of life, myofascial pain syndrome, physical therapy.

References

1. Белова АН. Нейрореабилитация: руководство для врачей. Москва: Антидор; 2007. 568 с.
2. Дривотинов БВ, Полякова ТД, Панкова МД. Физическая реабилитация при неврологических проявлениях остеохондрозапозвоночника: учеб. пособие. Минск: БГУФК; 2005. 211 с.
3. Епифанов ВА, Епифанов АВ. Остеохондроз позвоночника (диагностика, лечение, профилактика). Москва: МЕДпресс-информ; 2004. 272 с.
4. Епифанов ВА. Лечебная физическая культура. Москва: Медицина; 2014. 568 с.
5. Боголюбова ВМ, редактор. Медицинская реабилитация в 3 т. Книга 1, 2, 3. Изд. 3-е, испр. и доп. Москва: БИНОМ; 2010. 416 с.
6. Шевченко ЮЛ, редактор. Новик АА, Ионова ТИ. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине. 2-е изд. Москва: ЗАО “ОЛМА Медиа Групп”; 2007. 320 с.
7. Епифанова ВА, редактор. Медицинская реабилитация: руководство для врачей. Москва: МЕД-пресс-информ; 2005. 328 с.
8. Попелянский ЯЮ. Остеохондроз. Клинический аспект. Мануальная терапія. 2005; 1: 81–83.
9. Филиппович НФ, Криштофович ИЮ. Диагностика и лечение мышечно-тонических синдромов поясничного остеохондроза. Искусство медицины. 2008; 1: 13–16.
10. Leboeuf-Yde C. Back pain-individual and genetic factors. J. Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004; 14 (1): 129–133.
References
1. Belova AN. Neurorehabilitation: a guide for doctors. Moscow: Antidor; 2007. 568 p.
2. Drivotinov BV, Polyakova TD, Pankova MD. Physical rehabilitation in neurological manifestations of spinal osteochondrosis: textbook. allowance. Minsk: BSUFK; 2005. 211 s.
3. Epifanov VA, Epifanov AV. Spinal osteochondrosis (diagnosis, treatment, prevention). Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2004. 272 s.
4. Epifanov VA. Healing Fitness. Moscow: Medicine; 2014. 568 s.
5. Bogolyubova VM, editors. Medical rehabilitation in 3 volumes. Book 1, 2, 3. Ed. 3rd, rev. and add. Moscow: BINOM; 2010. 416 s.
6. Shevchenko YL, editors. Novik AA, Ionova TI. Guidelines for the study of quality of life in medicine. 2nd edition. Moscow: ZAO OLMA Media Group; 2007. 320 s.
7. Epifanova VA, editors. Medical Rehabilitation: A Guide for Physicians. Moscow: MED-press-inform; 2005. 328 s.
8. Popelyansky YAYU. Osteochondrosis. Clinical aspect. Manual therapy. 2005; 1: 81–83.
9. Filippovich NF, Krishtofovich IU. Diagnostics and treatment of muscular-tonic syndromes of lumbar osteochondrosis. The art of medicine. 2008; 1: 13–16.
10. Leboeuf-Yde C. Back pain-individual and genetic factors. J. Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004; 14 (1): 129–133.

Published

2020-10-07

Issue

Section

Articles